Smith & Wesson SD9VE – review
My wife decided recently that she wanted a handgun to carry for self defense, so we started doing a little research and window shopping to try a pick out a good one. We pretty much decided to go with an auto-loader for magazine capacity, and we talked some about caliber. We considered both .380 and 9mm. Many .380’s are more compact and it’s a slightly tamer round than the 9mm, but my wife wasn’t concerned too much about recoil. She regularly shoots my .357 revolver so she knew that the 9mm wouldn’t be a problem. Our main concern was the thickness of the grip. She shot my Taurus PT-92 and found that it didn’t feel comfortable in her hand. The grip was just too bulky, and her thumb couldn’t reach the left side magazine release button. She fired my brother-in-law’s Ruger LCP .380, but she felt that it was too small and she was concerned about the stopping power of the lighter round. So we pretty much decided on a 9mm; it was just a matter of finding one with a double stack magazine that would fit her hand. A 9mm would have the added bonus of being kind of a family standard round. I have a 9mm, my son has a 9mm, my brother-in-law has a 9mm, and my son-in-law has a 9mm; so when we get a good deal on ammo we can buy in bulk (no good deals lately).
So we knew that we were looking for a 9mm auto loader with a high capacity magazine. The next step was to go to the gun shop and try a few on for size. We tried a Beretta, a Glock, a Sig, a Springfield, a Kel-Tec, and a Smith and Wesson. The Smith and Wesson SD9VE was the best fit. We held the SD9VE up next to a couple of the other nines and determined that the difference in size was due to the thinner slabs on the grip. The body of the grip was the same width as the other pistols, so it had no problem holding a double stack magazine.
The only thing that worried me a little was that, with the exception of the Kel-Tec, it was considerably less expensive than the others. I didn’t want my wife trusting her life to a junker (although I have never heard of a Smith and Wesson junker), so it was time to do a little inter-net research.
The reviews that I read and watched were nearly all positive. There were some concerns expressed about durability of the slide guide-rod since it is polymer rather than steel; and several noted that the SD9 has no safety. But all reviewers seemed to agree that it was a sweet shooter and fed all brands of ammo with great reliability. I was interested to read that Glock had actually sued Smith and Wesson over the design of this pistol, and I can see why they did. I held it up next to my son’-in-law’s Glock and it looked almost like a twin. Glock lost the law suit, by the way.
The Smith and Wesson SD9VE is a medium size auto loading pistol with a polymer frame and a stainless steel slide and barrel. The barrel is four inches long. The SD9VE is chambered for 9mm parabellum. It has a double stack magazine with 16 rounds capacity.
Every shot is double action, and the trigger has about a seven pound pull. There is no safety on this firearm. It will still fire without the magazine inserted. The SD9VE is 1.5 inches wide, 7.2 inches long, and weighs 22.7 ounces without the magazine. The sights are fixed with a white dot on the front post and to each side of the rear notch.
My personal impression of the SD9VE is that it appears to be a good solid, reliable firearm. The price is very reasonable. Both my wife and I fired several magazines through it. The trigger pull did not feel too stiff to either one of us, and every round fed without problem. Magazine transitions were smooth and easy, and accuracy was good. Of course, this firearm is not nearly as rugged as my all metal PT-92, but we are not anticipating prolonged field carry or huge volumes of fire. This firearm is plenty rugged enough and plenty reliable enough for civilian defense purposes. It is a great gun for the money, indeed it is the easy equivalent of guns that cost much more. I would recommend it to anyone.